Watch the video and see the pics straight from the red carpet and after party.
Top Stories
Just In
- 14:46pm Three new dinosaurs…
- 19:35pm Squid Proxy Server O…
- 19:30pm Installing Adobe AIR…
- 16:03pm Get Smarter
- 15:58pm Michael Bay Finally…
- 12:03pm Kinder Surprise GIAN…
- 15:11pm Hamish & Andy In…
- 14:32pm Miss Universe Turned…
- 14:01pm William Rast Designe…
- 14:00pm Patrick Dempsey's 'S…
MySpace Searching for Ways to Make Money
Early last year Peter Chernin, President and COO of News Corp said "People no longer use content that is pushed at them. They are organizing it themselves and organizing things around their interests". If by "content" Mr Chernin also means advertising it makes you wonder what was going through the minds of NewsCorp execs when they bought MySpace for over a billion last year.
MySpace users clearly like to organise their own content, and are averse to anybody pushing ads on them - so how do NewsCorp intend to monetize their billion dollar baby. This challenge was clearly occupying MySpace chief marketing officer Shawn Gold when he spoke at the ad:tech conference in Sydney last week. For whilst he spruked MySpace as the the "Number one video distribution space on the internet, followed by Google and Youtube at number 3", his strategy for making money from all this content was all about pushing ads down users throats. Which meant for much of his presentations he sounded like the traditional ad salesman pushing cost effective audience aggregation, value for money, and the ability to target small market segments.
Currently MySpace serves up 40 million ads a month, which in terms of their total inventory (think of 150million users staring at a screen for hours) is actually quite small, and probably doesn't deliver the type of revenue that justifies a billion plus price tag on the company. So things will only get worse for MySpace users who hated stuff being pushed at them right from the start. Now, I can see why advertisers want to get into MySpace.
After all some research suggests that over 70% of consumer purchases are influenced by information accessed on the Internet. Savvy companies don't kid themselves that consumers run to their corporate website to get the lowdown on the products they buy - They know it's in the exchange of information and opinion between users at sites like MySpace that the real purchasing influence occurs. So is the only response to push ads around the periphery of this crucial information exchange, given that so many users think it's an unwanted intrusion. The simple answer is No. Pushing ads won't work and MySpace will suffer as they try to increase their ad revenues.
After all, it's easy for consumers to go elsewhere if they want to share their content and opinions - And soon someone will work out that there are many consumers who are passionate about the brands they consume and are happy to share their experience. You won't make money pushing ads at these people but you will if you make it easy for them to create cohesive online communities who's opinions and experiences are just what other consumers are looking for - but find so hard to find through search engines like Google.
Find the background to this story at the link below


Comments
I think when MySpace was bought by NewsCorp things were always bound to go that way.
Don’t get me wrong, I think that online ads have huge potential, but they have to be done in the right way and not at the expense of a community. Most MySpace pages are an eye-sore already before being loaded with more and more ads. They already appear as an intrusion.
I wonder if a revenue-share model with its users would mean that MySpace users are more accepting of ads being placed all over their pages?
I do find Gold’s attitude a bit surprising given the dynamics of the MySpace crowd. If Murdoch could see the value in MySpace, when everyone else was wary, you would think that there would be a much more innovative monetization plan than just sell as many ads as possible.
You must be logged in to vote
Bronwen wrote:
Online ads have huge potential - that is for sure - but they are proving to be a real danger to users and, to be honest, threatening the entire “revenue via adverts” model. We’re actively warning users to block entire advert domains because of the constant problem of malware pushers infiltrating advertisements:
Examples:
Malware outbreak on the MSN advert network
Myspace serving up Winfixre aka Drivecleaner aka Errorsafe via banner ads
Over 1 million MySpace users infected via a hostile advertisement
You must be logged in to vote
MySpace was actually bought for $580 million, not over a billion. They then entered a deal with Google for $900 million over the next few years, and just announced quarterly revenue of $75 million (triple the previous quarter). Their traffic grow (using Alexa) also looks strong. So I think you might have picked the wrong candidate for your argument, as they are doing pretty well.
You must be logged in to vote
Actually it was 649M USD, which is getting close to $1B AUD. They will also need to make considerably more than $75 a quarter in order to provide the type of ROI NewsCorp will want in the long run.
You must be logged in to vote
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.